I attended the Ethics section in The Nonhuman Turn conference. There were two presenters; the topics presented were Companionable Objects, Companionable Conscience and Ethology become ethics: exploding Uexkull. The former of the two discussed the heritage of the Tau Tau and their symbolism relating to their culture. These highly respected figures not only symbolize deceased family members they are also considered a work of art-- highly recognized. Because of their value the original artifacts are hidden away in a private place. Leaving replicas displayed for their beauty and symbolism.
The latter of the two topics discussed Uexkull specifically Romanticism, Vitalism, and Conservation, and Place not Space. This presenter was a little more difficult for me to understand. Possibly because it seemed the topic was more abstract to grasp than what I'm used to. However, there was one concept presented relating to Uexkull which was the notion of modernity being soulless, ultimately abandoning God. Also the idea of our senses created to comprehend nature, not God. This particular statement made me ponder the concept of creation and nature. Especially focusing in on animals and their ability to survive on nature alone. Their senses especially were made to comprehend nature. This was the most moving argument I got from second speaker in the conference.
Out of the two presenters and their relation to our class the second specifically discussed animals and contradicting Uexkull's viewpoint. However, the first presenter didn't really discuss the image of animals, yet culture and traditions in rural third world villages. I found the Tau Tau experience the most interesting, primarily because it was on the a topic I had no idea existed and it does play close to heart on so many of these individuals living in the village. There is nothing more intimate than preserving or discussing a loved on that past, and pictures along with the presentation only solidified than notion.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Monday, April 30, 2012
Animal- Human Perception
It seems that everything in this world is interconnected. Everything is related and has a purpose. Humans have a purpose, though to narrow down what specifically that is would be rather difficult. However, animals also have a purpose. Animals have these automatic instilled routines that is the central reason for their life and their actions throughout the day.
Jakob von Uexkull discusses perception on a level that I never even knew existed or mattered. " Life is not just about matter or how it immediately interacts with itself, but also how the matter acts with interconnected systems that include organisms in their separately perceiving worlds." Uexkull later goes on saying these perceived worlds are incomplete. I think what Uexkull is trying to get at is that the world each human lives in is very different from the world another may experience. Because perception varies so drastically by each person, life experiences also contrast.Ultimately, altering perception.
The same goes for animals. Even though all animals are living and have some sort of role to fulfill their duties to survive and thrive, it is rather difficult to compare two animals of different species and the world they may experience. Uexkull uses the comparison on honeybees and their role within their breed and dynamics pertaining to the the upkeep of their hive. These honeybees go on a misson in search of necessities the hive may need. When they find what they are looking for such as pollen, water, or nectar, they return back to the hive and communicate through spitting and dancing to inform the other bees. This has become their life, and form of communication. This is the honeybees world. To maintain the nest and follow orders from the queen bee, since bees work in a hierarchy fashion. The honeybee's perception on the world merely consists on their ability to thrive which reflects the how well they have been maintaining their hive. Bees aren't concerned with anything else in the world, their perception is very narrow, Uexkull would say incomplete.
Every organism has an incomplete perception. Primarily because every role in life is different than one another. It's a difficult, and at times an unreal concept to fathom knowing that each organism has a purpose and the world they know is so limited, obviously the goes for humans, Uexkull stated that humans think they perceive so much, but in actuality doctors and scientists still see and understand such a limited amount of the world, primarily because we all have separately perceiving worlds that are inevitable.
Jakob von Uexkull discusses perception on a level that I never even knew existed or mattered. " Life is not just about matter or how it immediately interacts with itself, but also how the matter acts with interconnected systems that include organisms in their separately perceiving worlds." Uexkull later goes on saying these perceived worlds are incomplete. I think what Uexkull is trying to get at is that the world each human lives in is very different from the world another may experience. Because perception varies so drastically by each person, life experiences also contrast.Ultimately, altering perception.
The same goes for animals. Even though all animals are living and have some sort of role to fulfill their duties to survive and thrive, it is rather difficult to compare two animals of different species and the world they may experience. Uexkull uses the comparison on honeybees and their role within their breed and dynamics pertaining to the the upkeep of their hive. These honeybees go on a misson in search of necessities the hive may need. When they find what they are looking for such as pollen, water, or nectar, they return back to the hive and communicate through spitting and dancing to inform the other bees. This has become their life, and form of communication. This is the honeybees world. To maintain the nest and follow orders from the queen bee, since bees work in a hierarchy fashion. The honeybee's perception on the world merely consists on their ability to thrive which reflects the how well they have been maintaining their hive. Bees aren't concerned with anything else in the world, their perception is very narrow, Uexkull would say incomplete.
Every organism has an incomplete perception. Primarily because every role in life is different than one another. It's a difficult, and at times an unreal concept to fathom knowing that each organism has a purpose and the world they know is so limited, obviously the goes for humans, Uexkull stated that humans think they perceive so much, but in actuality doctors and scientists still see and understand such a limited amount of the world, primarily because we all have separately perceiving worlds that are inevitable.
Sunday, April 8, 2012
"Animals are Mere Machines?"
"An Animals Place" by Micheal Pollan reaches the sad yet truthful relationship humans have with animals. Not a pet dog, but truly animals. The pig at the farm. Pollan used the analogy of half of American's dog population will receive Christmas presents, however little consider the life of a pig, an equally intelligent animal. There has become a disconnect with animals that provide us nourishment. It's assumed our meat comes for the grocery store rather than a farm. When this disconnect is present it takes away any sense of emotion that could be tied to animal welfare.
Pollan goes on acknowledging our countries that have taken on animal rights first hand. Europe, Germany in particular has granted animals a constitutional right. England banned farming animals for fur. The European progression is vast. Though it takes America more time to adapt to change, we are transforming. Pollan mentions McDonalds and Burger King improving the US Meat Industry. Food Inc also mentions this when they are discussing organics with the Wal-Mart buyers. If the demand is there, businesses will seek to meet it. It may take awhile, but it's going to happen.
Pollan later goes on discussing the concept of Animal Liberation. This topic appeals to me in a very interesting way. Probably because I am not so sure what my stance is. " The very existence of predation–animals eating animals." I have never actually thought of this when considering going vegetarian or vegan. I was vegan for approximately 6 months. My reasoning for this was primarily a healthier diet and after reading a book called, Skinny Bitch. Similar to Pollan it discussed animal rights and health aspects of a vegan diet. Anyhow, animals were designed when in their natural state to survive and thrive which leads to eating other animals-- "the intrinsic evil in nature’s design." It is a messed up thought being designed to eat another being, but it's nature; I don't think I could ever argue altering natures natural path, the ecological role.
One concept I learned from a philosopher at a young age was that the difference between humans and animals is that we have the ability to reason. I have interpreted this as, we humans have an obligation to not only thrive but to allow others to thrive as well. Allow nature to thrive. Allow animals to thrive. In order to do this ethics and humanity play a huge role. In order to create a much more coherent universe we need to consider our emotions and the emotions of other beings, such as animals. It's important to treat a pig well, because a pig's emotional state affects it's health. Health can be linked to a lot of different aspects within a pigs body, but when it does come time to consume this meat, who wants to eat a depressed pig that was treated awfully and lived in a dark and dirty factory. I will always choose to eat a pig that lived a happy life. Happiness is key, and it's our duty and humans that have the ability to reason, to do our part and protect those that don't have a voice.
Pollan goes on acknowledging our countries that have taken on animal rights first hand. Europe, Germany in particular has granted animals a constitutional right. England banned farming animals for fur. The European progression is vast. Though it takes America more time to adapt to change, we are transforming. Pollan mentions McDonalds and Burger King improving the US Meat Industry. Food Inc also mentions this when they are discussing organics with the Wal-Mart buyers. If the demand is there, businesses will seek to meet it. It may take awhile, but it's going to happen.
Pollan later goes on discussing the concept of Animal Liberation. This topic appeals to me in a very interesting way. Probably because I am not so sure what my stance is. " The very existence of predation–animals eating animals." I have never actually thought of this when considering going vegetarian or vegan. I was vegan for approximately 6 months. My reasoning for this was primarily a healthier diet and after reading a book called, Skinny Bitch. Similar to Pollan it discussed animal rights and health aspects of a vegan diet. Anyhow, animals were designed when in their natural state to survive and thrive which leads to eating other animals-- "the intrinsic evil in nature’s design." It is a messed up thought being designed to eat another being, but it's nature; I don't think I could ever argue altering natures natural path, the ecological role.
One concept I learned from a philosopher at a young age was that the difference between humans and animals is that we have the ability to reason. I have interpreted this as, we humans have an obligation to not only thrive but to allow others to thrive as well. Allow nature to thrive. Allow animals to thrive. In order to do this ethics and humanity play a huge role. In order to create a much more coherent universe we need to consider our emotions and the emotions of other beings, such as animals. It's important to treat a pig well, because a pig's emotional state affects it's health. Health can be linked to a lot of different aspects within a pigs body, but when it does come time to consume this meat, who wants to eat a depressed pig that was treated awfully and lived in a dark and dirty factory. I will always choose to eat a pig that lived a happy life. Happiness is key, and it's our duty and humans that have the ability to reason, to do our part and protect those that don't have a voice.
Monday, April 2, 2012
Anthropomorphism in Short Stories
During our creative projects, I was absolutely amazed with the anthropomorphism the short stories portrayed. The ability and power these stories hold on someones emotions is mammoth. It was almost like watching a movie, these stories kept the reader engaged throughout the duration.
One that reached out to me in a strong way was the lonely goldfish. Maybe this is because it had a less than pleasant ending. However, it seems a little ironic that out of all the stories we heard this one in particular left the greatest impact. I've never owned a fish or have even really considered them an emotional creature. Yet, in this story I nearly cried.
I suppose a well written story can reach an entirely new audience like myself. Anthropomorphising this little gold fish was a perfect way for me to realize fish have feelings too. The power stories hold and the ability they have to affect individual's thoughts and emotions is truly bewildering; sometimes even more effective than films.
One that reached out to me in a strong way was the lonely goldfish. Maybe this is because it had a less than pleasant ending. However, it seems a little ironic that out of all the stories we heard this one in particular left the greatest impact. I've never owned a fish or have even really considered them an emotional creature. Yet, in this story I nearly cried.
I suppose a well written story can reach an entirely new audience like myself. Anthropomorphising this little gold fish was a perfect way for me to realize fish have feelings too. The power stories hold and the ability they have to affect individual's thoughts and emotions is truly bewildering; sometimes even more effective than films.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Contemporary Zoos
As a child I loved the zoo, everything about. It seemed so magical. Within the past two years, my perception has changed quite dramatically. It’s not that I no longer enjoy or like the zoo, however I can’t help but think of animals in captivity. Taxidermy, robotics, and special effects have the ability to not only preserve but also create a positive change in zoos.
One great aspect of zoos is their educational value. With taxidermy, robotics, and special effects it would be possible to preserve certain animals with a specific condition and continue to educate even though the animal has past; this is all possible through taxidermy. Though some may argue that taxidermy is cruel and inhumane, it does serve a purpose. Above all, education should be the main motivation.
Robotics and special effects have the ability to advance zoos to a great extent. Even though many visit the zoo to see the animals, shows are also an added bonus. Robotic animals and special effects can create a fascinating presentation without involving actual animals, but yet still so lifelike. Animals that are put through trainings to be involved in theatrical shows can be abused through the vigorous demanding schedule and constant critique. This is an easy alternative that not only benefits the animals it sets zoos to a higher standard as being seen as a more respectable destination. We have come a long way in the transformation of traditional to contemporary zoos, but we still have the ability to improve so much—with technology it makes this possible.
Monday, March 5, 2012
At the Zoo
Growing up, my family has always enjoyed the Zoo, as entertainment yet more important a time for bonding. I recall having my 12th Birthday at the Minnesota State Zoo. My favorite exhibit were the baboons. While attending, the current condition of the animal's happiness never came to mind, not once.
However, this all changed when I went to the zoo again this past summer with my sister and nephews. My perspective has transformed dramatically. One specific experience I recall perfectly was the "tiger den." Visitors were to view the tiger from above. Even though the tiger's area had forestry and a small pond, all I can remember is the tiger pacing back and forth along the edge of the fence. I think back at how taken sad I was, even now. The tiger seemed so unhappy. When an animal paces back and forth anytime, I instantly think of misery.
I know I don't have the power quite yet to implement change in this tiger's life, but someday I hope I do. Zoo's can be a great thing; whether it is through education or animal rehabilitation they do serve a purpose. There just has to be a way to ensure animal happiness at a greater level.
However, this all changed when I went to the zoo again this past summer with my sister and nephews. My perspective has transformed dramatically. One specific experience I recall perfectly was the "tiger den." Visitors were to view the tiger from above. Even though the tiger's area had forestry and a small pond, all I can remember is the tiger pacing back and forth along the edge of the fence. I think back at how taken sad I was, even now. The tiger seemed so unhappy. When an animal paces back and forth anytime, I instantly think of misery.
I know I don't have the power quite yet to implement change in this tiger's life, but someday I hope I do. Zoo's can be a great thing; whether it is through education or animal rehabilitation they do serve a purpose. There just has to be a way to ensure animal happiness at a greater level.
Sunday, February 26, 2012
An All-Knowing Animal
Jonathan Burt analyzes on the the very first animal hero films ever made entitled, Rescued by Rover (Hepworth, 1905). The theme of this film involves a pet collie, Rover that acts as the families protector. The nanny goes on a walk with a family's baby and loses the child during her stroll. When she returns home without the baby in hand, loss and suspicion arise. Rover immediately takes on an authoritative role and goes out searching for the baby. Rover then gets the father's attention and forces him to follow, leading him to the baby to bring her home.
The relationship between Rover and the father illustrates trust and understanding. With a silent film in particular such as Rescued by Rover, actions have to say everything. As Rover retraces his path three times to affirm where the baby is located, he is exemplifying strength and persistence-- both traits in which dogs are recognized and admired for; a reason why many families opt to get a family dog. Rover is the only figure on the film who "understands" as much as the camera (116). Burt describes these themes as mechanical (the pursuit) and the non-mechanical (the possibility of a common understanding outside language) come together without actually collapsing into each other (117). Essentially, this is a perfect example of human-animal relationships. In particular how a connection can be discerned through a pet dog and owner. A connection so strong working together, they are able to save their baby, and live happily ever after. :)
The relationship between Rover and the father illustrates trust and understanding. With a silent film in particular such as Rescued by Rover, actions have to say everything. As Rover retraces his path three times to affirm where the baby is located, he is exemplifying strength and persistence-- both traits in which dogs are recognized and admired for; a reason why many families opt to get a family dog. Rover is the only figure on the film who "understands" as much as the camera (116). Burt describes these themes as mechanical (the pursuit) and the non-mechanical (the possibility of a common understanding outside language) come together without actually collapsing into each other (117). Essentially, this is a perfect example of human-animal relationships. In particular how a connection can be discerned through a pet dog and owner. A connection so strong working together, they are able to save their baby, and live happily ever after. :)
Monday, February 20, 2012
Herzog's, Grizzly Man.
There seem to be many complications and emotions running through Herzog's, Grizzly Man. This film highlighted the journey of Timothy Treadwell and his intimate ties to grizzly bears. Treadwell automatically thinking he is apart of the grizzly family and resides in their land takes on a ignorant role. Understanding the grizzly behavior was something Treadwell took pride in. However, little did he know that understanding or not he can't change their instinctual behavior. Treadwell took on the point of view as one of the animals, yet as human, they do not see him as a fellow brother, merely a piece of flesh and vulnerability.
Treadwell became one with nature. Through Transcendentalism, he is able to capture his surroundings and animals within and form a sort of bond that is often uncommon. Such as his relationship with his friend Fox. Living with and only with nature, Treadwell is able to adapt more with his surroundings and assuming he is then able to communicate with this grizzly bears on a more personal level, when in reality, they still have yet to consider him one of their own.
This brings forth many questions when relating transcendentalism and human behavior with authentic nature. Mankind is only capable of so much, especially when relating and connecting them to a wild animal such as a grizzly bear. As much passion and devotion Treadwell had with his relationship between these bears, if they do not see him as one of their own, he's doomed from the beginning. And, with this, I would argue Herzog's hidden perspective: trying to show the viewers-- the struggles with human and animals bonds, and the potential for them to be absolutely false.
Treadwell became one with nature. Through Transcendentalism, he is able to capture his surroundings and animals within and form a sort of bond that is often uncommon. Such as his relationship with his friend Fox. Living with and only with nature, Treadwell is able to adapt more with his surroundings and assuming he is then able to communicate with this grizzly bears on a more personal level, when in reality, they still have yet to consider him one of their own.
This brings forth many questions when relating transcendentalism and human behavior with authentic nature. Mankind is only capable of so much, especially when relating and connecting them to a wild animal such as a grizzly bear. As much passion and devotion Treadwell had with his relationship between these bears, if they do not see him as one of their own, he's doomed from the beginning. And, with this, I would argue Herzog's hidden perspective: trying to show the viewers-- the struggles with human and animals bonds, and the potential for them to be absolutely false.
Friday, February 10, 2012
Nature and Morality
Does society use nature to describe morality? The complexities of nature and morals is unfathomable. Yet, they come to thought every single day. So, what does this mean?
My stance of nature and morality is human's weakness. As humans are an intelligent beings, morality is often the foreground for everyday life. With constant expectations and desires, our morals often play a significant role in decisions and goals.
Yet, as humans we do have these instincts and behaviors that can be seen as primal. If we give into these desires is that just nature playing its course? For those that fall victim, the easy answer is yes. We are animals, it's only "natural" to have multiple partners and not consider emotions.
Angels and Insects focused a lot on social class and behaviors within them. Red and Black Ants. Being intermingled within a class and desiring to get out. I would argue the idea of wanting to escape a social class is morality and not nature. Primarily because from what I've learned, it's natures path to pack and group animals of the same breed. Though William was not the same breed as the Alabaster's, he was somewhat welcomed into their world, his morals forced him to leave. His morals witnessed the natural corruption and he felt he had to escape.
In life we are faced with many circumstances that force us to think of nature and morals. It's entirely our decision on how we answer and react to the conditions surrounding us. The notion of morality would perhaps be the more sophisticated choice, such as William's. Yet our natural instincts may desire otherwise.
My stance of nature and morality is human's weakness. As humans are an intelligent beings, morality is often the foreground for everyday life. With constant expectations and desires, our morals often play a significant role in decisions and goals.
Yet, as humans we do have these instincts and behaviors that can be seen as primal. If we give into these desires is that just nature playing its course? For those that fall victim, the easy answer is yes. We are animals, it's only "natural" to have multiple partners and not consider emotions.
Angels and Insects focused a lot on social class and behaviors within them. Red and Black Ants. Being intermingled within a class and desiring to get out. I would argue the idea of wanting to escape a social class is morality and not nature. Primarily because from what I've learned, it's natures path to pack and group animals of the same breed. Though William was not the same breed as the Alabaster's, he was somewhat welcomed into their world, his morals forced him to leave. His morals witnessed the natural corruption and he felt he had to escape.
In life we are faced with many circumstances that force us to think of nature and morals. It's entirely our decision on how we answer and react to the conditions surrounding us. The notion of morality would perhaps be the more sophisticated choice, such as William's. Yet our natural instincts may desire otherwise.
Monday, February 6, 2012
"Naming" our Animals
In our society we name everything. Naming can be looked at as giving something human characteristics. It creates a more personal connection. Instead of looking at an animal as just an "animal," with a name, it becomes a pet and family member.
Names can vary substantially. A dog can be named Roy, Zoe, and Jillian. All of these names are much more human-like. As far as why one would rather name their animal Ralph could be an example of respect. More importantly, seeing your pet as another individual with rights and feelings; instead of just an animal. A sense of equality has formed.
On the other hand it is quite common for people to choose a more clever and exciting name for their pets. Snickers, Nilla, Oreo, Scooter, and my personal favorite, Schnitzel. Do these names immediately create a sense of hierarchy? Owners being more superior to their pets?
To explicate this a little further, even though names are maybe the most single unique and personal ability owners have over their pets, I don't think it is done as power-forming. I think the act in choosing a pet name is more so done out of compassion and the possibilty to build a relationship. Some owners may constantly show that superiority to their animals, but I would also infer they may show that to humans as well. As far as other pet owners go, when you have a pet many do think of them as a family member; they treat them with respect and get them a toy on their birthday and for Christmas.
Names can vary substantially. A dog can be named Roy, Zoe, and Jillian. All of these names are much more human-like. As far as why one would rather name their animal Ralph could be an example of respect. More importantly, seeing your pet as another individual with rights and feelings; instead of just an animal. A sense of equality has formed.
On the other hand it is quite common for people to choose a more clever and exciting name for their pets. Snickers, Nilla, Oreo, Scooter, and my personal favorite, Schnitzel. Do these names immediately create a sense of hierarchy? Owners being more superior to their pets?
To explicate this a little further, even though names are maybe the most single unique and personal ability owners have over their pets, I don't think it is done as power-forming. I think the act in choosing a pet name is more so done out of compassion and the possibilty to build a relationship. Some owners may constantly show that superiority to their animals, but I would also infer they may show that to humans as well. As far as other pet owners go, when you have a pet many do think of them as a family member; they treat them with respect and get them a toy on their birthday and for Christmas.
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Susan McHugh's, Bitches From Brazil.
(1)
McHugh's article, discussed the bold questions of cloning and the integral concerns behind the topic. In today's world money can buy anything, and that's exactly what this article is outlining. To explicate it a little further, wealthy owners have an aging dog named Missy. Rather than facing the reality that Missy will no longer to apart of their life in the future, they want to buy a "new" Missy, though the original essence of Missy will not be present this new created canine.
Marketing is a significant tool with tremendous power. While McHugh's article outlines the concerns for cloning, she also explicates the power of marketing behind potentially questionable ideas or concerns. Again, money can buy approval. McHugh talks about how society may not be so keen on the idea of cloning dogs at first, "It will take the general public about 5 minutes to accept dog cloning, once the first puppies are born and shown on the evening news" (196). Society falls in love with baby animals; whether that is kittens, bunnies, fawns, or puppies, when we look at this little creatures to the human eye it doesn't matter where they came from because we will fall in love with them anyway.
(2)
"Cute" and "Anti-Cute." Why do we find some animals adorable and others not as adorable, I find some quite frightening. I suppose it is all perception, some individuals favor different critters. I am not a fan of reptiles or amphibians. Yet, I know a number of people that love their pet snake or gecko. I think at a young age if you are exposed these "anti-cute" creatures your perception may actually see them as cute. Whereas, more traditionally when someone is only around they furry pets, a reptile is like night and day, it is pretty obvious why this cold blooded snake isn't cute to a cat owner.
The "anti-cute" pets to me aren't necessarily repulsing, yet I just don't have a desire to own one or even pretend to enjoy their appearance. I would never insult a lizard or turtle, but I suppose I feel like I don't have any personal ties to them which directly relates towards their "cuteness" factor. I would imagine childhood history plays a substantial role in "cuteness."
(3)
Providing affections for some animals and not others directly relates to the "cute" and "anti-cute" animals. I think if someone is brought up with a pet turtle, they will more than likely always have warm feelings for turtles. As a child, I remember several of my friends having snapping turtles as pets. I never cared for them, but to this day one particular friend is still in love with turtles. All animals are different, just the same with all people. Everyone finds affections in different ways.
My affection goes to my feline Persian cat, Schnitzel. I love all cats, but to be completely honest, I have way more affection to Schnitzel than I do towards my childhood cats at my parents house and even my Siberian Husky. The experiences one has with their animals from the beginning most certainly weigh in on how their affection grows into a relationship.
McHugh's article, discussed the bold questions of cloning and the integral concerns behind the topic. In today's world money can buy anything, and that's exactly what this article is outlining. To explicate it a little further, wealthy owners have an aging dog named Missy. Rather than facing the reality that Missy will no longer to apart of their life in the future, they want to buy a "new" Missy, though the original essence of Missy will not be present this new created canine.
Marketing is a significant tool with tremendous power. While McHugh's article outlines the concerns for cloning, she also explicates the power of marketing behind potentially questionable ideas or concerns. Again, money can buy approval. McHugh talks about how society may not be so keen on the idea of cloning dogs at first, "It will take the general public about 5 minutes to accept dog cloning, once the first puppies are born and shown on the evening news" (196). Society falls in love with baby animals; whether that is kittens, bunnies, fawns, or puppies, when we look at this little creatures to the human eye it doesn't matter where they came from because we will fall in love with them anyway.
(2)
"Cute" and "Anti-Cute." Why do we find some animals adorable and others not as adorable, I find some quite frightening. I suppose it is all perception, some individuals favor different critters. I am not a fan of reptiles or amphibians. Yet, I know a number of people that love their pet snake or gecko. I think at a young age if you are exposed these "anti-cute" creatures your perception may actually see them as cute. Whereas, more traditionally when someone is only around they furry pets, a reptile is like night and day, it is pretty obvious why this cold blooded snake isn't cute to a cat owner.
The "anti-cute" pets to me aren't necessarily repulsing, yet I just don't have a desire to own one or even pretend to enjoy their appearance. I would never insult a lizard or turtle, but I suppose I feel like I don't have any personal ties to them which directly relates towards their "cuteness" factor. I would imagine childhood history plays a substantial role in "cuteness."
(3)
Providing affections for some animals and not others directly relates to the "cute" and "anti-cute" animals. I think if someone is brought up with a pet turtle, they will more than likely always have warm feelings for turtles. As a child, I remember several of my friends having snapping turtles as pets. I never cared for them, but to this day one particular friend is still in love with turtles. All animals are different, just the same with all people. Everyone finds affections in different ways.
My affection goes to my feline Persian cat, Schnitzel. I love all cats, but to be completely honest, I have way more affection to Schnitzel than I do towards my childhood cats at my parents house and even my Siberian Husky. The experiences one has with their animals from the beginning most certainly weigh in on how their affection grows into a relationship.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)